UNHCR Protection Manual
The Protection Manual is UNHCR's repository of protection policy and guidance. The documents are listed in reverse chronological order.
View with description
-
A.
-
B.
-
-
C.
-
F.
-
H.
Showing 541 results for
The UNHCR Strategy suggests targeted interventions to address the protection needs of refugees, asylum-seekers and stateless persons affected by smuggling and trafficking in the region, through coordination and partnerships for a regional and solutions-oriented approach. It further notes that collaborative national and regional action with States, mandated organisations and key stakeholders is considered the best way forward to address the various stages of the phenomenon.
- Document source:
- Date: March 2013
- Document source:
- Date: 27 February 2013
- Document source:
- Date: 29 January 2013
Mr José Riera, Senior Adviser to the Director of International Protection, Challenges relating to climate change induced displacement, UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), 29 January 2013, https://www.refworld.org/policy/declas/unhcr/2013/89690 [accessed 26 April 2026]
- Document source:
- Date: 2013
- Document source:
- Date: 2013
- Document source:
- Date: 2013
- Document source:
- Date: 21 December 2012
UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), Guidelines on Statelessness No. 4: Ensuring Every Child's Right to Acquire a Nationality through Articles 1-4 of the 1961 Convention on the Reduction of Statelessness, HCR/GS/12/04, 21 December 2012, https://www.refworld.org/policy/legalguidance/unhcr/2012/105120 [accessed 26 April 2026]
on the criteria for determining individual responsibility in the context of the application of Article 1F of the 1951 Convention, in particular in cases involving questions of complicity.
- Document source:
- Date: 15 December 2012
UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), UNHCR intervention before the Supreme Court of Canada in the case of Ezokola v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 15 December 2012, https://www.refworld.org/jurisprudence/amicus/unhcr/2012/16992 [accessed 26 April 2026]
- Document source:
- Date: December 2012
In both appeals the UKSC considered whether the applicants were excluded from asylum protection as result of the Convention on the Status of the Refugees art. 1F(c), because they were alleged to be serious reasons for considering that the appellants had been guilty of acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the UN. Member States were not free to adopt their own definitions of that phrase. It was appropriate to apply the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees Guidelines para.17.
- Document source:
- Date: 21 November 2012
Al-Sirri (FC) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent) and DD (Afghanistan) (FC) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent), [2012] UKSC 54, United Kingdom: Supreme Court, 21 November 2012, https://www.refworld.org/jurisprudence/caselaw/uksc/2012/89206 [accessed 26 April 2026]